Publication Date

Spring 3-31-2026

Presentation Length

20 minutes

College

College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences

Department

Philosophy, Department of

Student Level

Undergraduate

Faculty Mentor

MC Cunningham

Presentation Type

Talk/Oral

Summary

This paper argues that artificial intelligence in education is not inherently harmful, but becomes a problem depending on how it is used. Drawing on Aristotle’s concept of intellectual virtue and the Golden Mean, it shows that AI can either support or undermine learning. If students rely on AI to replace their own thinking, they fail to develop the reasoning skills necessary for intellectual virtue. However, when used in moderation, AI can help deepen understanding and strengthen critical thinking. The paper also examines a contradiction within the education system. While students are penalized for using AI, institutions rely on AI detection tools that to detect whether or not it is being used. Using Plato’s idea that authority should be grounded in knowledge, this is problematic because it shifts judgment away from actual understanding and toward flawed Artificial Intelligent enforcement. Ultimately, the paper argues that education should focus less on controlling AI use and more on whether students are genuinely engaging in the kind of thinking that leads to intellectual virtue.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.