Publication Date

2025

Presentation Length

20 minutes

College

College of Law

Department

Accounting and Management Information Systems

Student Level

Graduate

Faculty Mentor

Kristi Arth

Presentation Type

Talk/Oral

Summary

This paper argues that First Amendment challenges alone are not enough to address the rise of book bans in the United States. As restrictions increasingly limit access to works by minority and LGBTQ plus authors, new constitutional approaches are needed. Using the Law and Literature framework and Fahrenheit 451, the paper proposes applying Second Amendment principles to literature.

It contends that books function as powerful tools that shape thought and protect individuals from harmful ideas and government control. Like firearms, they support self defense, guard against government overreach, and provide personal value. By drawing this comparison, the paper shows that book bans restrict access to knowledge in ways that raise serious constitutional concerns.

The paper concludes that applying Second Amendment reasoning offers a new and compelling way to challenge censorship and defend access to ideas.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.