Publication Date

Spring 3-31-2026

Presentation Length

15 minutes

College

College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences

Department

Philosophy, Department of

Student Level

Undergraduate

Faculty Mentor

MC Cunningham

Presentation Type

Talk/Oral

Summary

This paper presents a clear argument that artificial intelligence in education is not inherently detrimental, but rather that its impact depends on how it is used. Drawing on Aristotle’s concept of intellectual virtue and the Golden Mean, it argues that AI can either hinder or enhance learning. When students rely on AI as a substitute for their own reasoning, they undermine the development of critical thinking skills essential to intellectual virtue. In contrast, when used in moderation, AI can function as a tool that deepens understanding and supports cognitive growth.

The paper also highlights a key inconsistency within educational institutions. While students are penalized for using AI, educators simultaneously depend on AI detection tools to enforce these rules. Through Plato’s framework that legitimate authority must be grounded in knowledge, this reliance is critiqued as problematic, as it shifts evaluative judgment away from genuine understanding and toward potentially unreliable technological systems. Ultimately, the paper contends that education should prioritize the cultivation of independent thinking and intellectual virtue rather than focusing primarily on regulating or policing AI usage.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.