Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2020

Abstract

This review examines Francis Fukuyama’s Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment and evaluates both its substantive thesis and its relevance to legal writing pedagogy. The reviewer summarizes Fukuyama’s three-part argument: that modern identity politics, rooted in the concept of thymos (the human desire for recognition), has reshaped political conflict; that this development poses a significant threat to liberal democratic institutions; and that a renewed, creedal national identity grounded in universal democratic values offers a necessary remedy. The review highlights major criticisms of Fukuyama’s historical framing, normative claims, and policy proposals, including his emphasis on assimilation and national service. Beyond engaging the political theory, the article situates the book within legal education discourse, arguing that Fukuyama’s writing style—efficient yet insufficiently attentive to audience and tone—provides a case study in rhetorical strategy for legal writing professors. The review further suggests that Fukuyama’s assimilation thesis raises important questions about professional identity formation in law school, thereby inviting further scholarly inquiry at the intersection of identity, pedagogy, and legal discourse.

Download

Share

COinS