Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Fall 9-22-2025

Abstract

This Article examines how the erosion of public trust in government and public health institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to the resurgence of measles in the United States. It argues that pandemic-era governance—marked by inconsistent scientific messaging, politically charged public health mandates, and the federal government’s coordination with social media platforms to suppress dissenting viewpoints—generated widespread skepticism that continues to undermine vaccination uptake. Through a detailed analysis of lockdown policies, vaccine and mask mandates, and the subsequent revelations regarding governmental influence over online content moderation, the Article demonstrates how conflicting guidance and perceived censorship fostered long-lasting public doubt. The discussion of Murthy v. Missouri further illustrates how concerns about First Amendment violations intensified this mistrust. Ultimately, the Article contends that rebuilding public trust—essential for effective public health interventions—requires robust governmental transparency and an openness to scientific debate. Without these reforms, the United States risks continued vulnerability to vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles.

Download

Share

COinS