Publication Date

Fall 9-27-2024

Presentation Length

Poster/Gallery presentation

College

Mike Curb College of Entertainment & Music Business

Department

Audio Engineering

Student Level

Graduate

SPARK Category

Research

Faculty Advisor

Wesley Bulla

Metadata/Fulltext

Fulltext

SPARK Session

Independent Presentation

Presentation Type

Poster

Summary

This study examines whether trained listeners could identify and judge the “naturalness” of drum samples processed with Dynamic Range Compression (DRC) when paired with unprocessed samples. A two-part experiment was conducted utilizing a paired comparison of a 10-second reference drum loop with no processing and a set of drum loops with varying degrees of DRC. In Part 1, subjects were instructed to identify which sample of the two they believed to have DRC applied. They were then asked to identify which sample they believed sounded “more natural” in Part 2. Out of 18 comparisons for Part 1, only three demonstrated reliable identification of the target variable. Results from Part 2 showed that the subjects perceived DRC processed samples as natural and unprocessed. However, while inconclusive, results here may suggest that listeners perceived the processed drum sound to be equally as natural as the original.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.